[ <= Previous archive ] [ Next archive=> ] [ Thread Index ] [ Archive Index and Search ]
355 messages in chronological order.GLUG messages are listed in the following format:
Subject (# of follow-ups) From
Re: [LUG] OT: Privacy is not dead
(2) tom
[LUG] ReactOS: Free NT clean-room clone
(1) Phil Hudson
[LUG] FAiF secure encrypted shared file
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] FAiF secure encrypted shared f
(0) Tom
[LUG] Raspberry Pi musescore monitoring
(0) Tom
[LUG] dvcs-autosync
(0) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Wireless router
(1) Daniel Robinson
[LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrary pa
(2) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] OT: Privacy is not dead
(2) Henry Bremridge
Re: [LUG] OT: Privacy is not dead
(0) Brad Rogers
Re: [LUG] OT: Privacy is not dead
(0) Brad Rogers
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(2) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(0) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] ReactOS: Free NT clean-room cl
(0) Simon Avery
[LUG] OT: Crypto schmypto
(2) Phil Hudson
Re: [LUG] OT: Crypto schmypto
(0) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] Wireless router
(1) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(0) bad apple
Re: [LUG] OT: Crypto schmypto
(0) wes
Re: [LUG] OT: Privacy is not dead
(0) raymond.knowles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: [LUG] Wireless router
(1) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] Wireless router
(0) Simon Avery
[LUG] Android email crypto
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] meeting reminders - September
(1) Rob Beard
Re: [LUG] meeting reminders - September
(0) Neil Stone
Re: [LUG] Android email crypto
(0) Neil Stone
[LUG] Microsoft: a new hope?
(1) Philip Hudson
[LUG] sinclair calculator
(0) Tom
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(1) Simon Avery
Re: [LUG] Microsoft: a new hope?
(1) Roland Tarver
Re: [LUG] Microsoft: a new hope?
(1) Daniel Case
Re: [LUG] Microsoft: a new hope?
(0) Joe Buckle
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(2) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(1) Matt Lee
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(1) Matt Lee
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(1) Gordon Henderson
[LUG] gentoo | systemd | static network
(0) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(1) wes
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(0) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Command-line: jump to arbitrar
(0) Matt Lee
[LUG] Next Microsoft CEO?
(1) Simon Avery
Re: [LUG] Next Microsoft CEO?
(1) Matt Lee
Re: [LUG] Next Microsoft CEO?
(2) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Next Microsoft CEO?
(2) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Next Microsoft CEO?
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Next Microsoft CEO?
(0) wes
Re: [LUG] Next Microsoft CEO?
(0) wes
[LUG] Yet more mini PCs
(1) George Parker
Re: [LUG] Next Microsoft CEO?
(1) Simon Avery
Re: [LUG] Yet more mini PCs
(0) Neil Stone
Re: [LUG] Next Microsoft CEO?
(0) Philip Hudson
[LUG] Separate Home Partition
(1) Neil Winchurst
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(2) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(1) Neil Winchurst
[LUG] Power supplies - do they have tran
(3) Tom
Re: [LUG] Power supplies - do they have
(1) raymond.knowles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: [LUG] Power supplies - do they have
(0) Robin Cornelius
Re: [LUG] Power supplies - do they have
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Power supplies - do they have
(0) Tom
[LUG] Out of memory )-:
(2) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Out of memory )-:
(1) Tom
[LUG] OT: NSA: Do they or don't they?
(2) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Out of memory )-:
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] OT: NSA: Do they or don't they
(1) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] Out of memory )-:
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] Out of memory )-:
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Out of memory )-:
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] Out of memory )-:
(1) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Out of memory )-:
(0) Gordon Henderson
[LUG] Caching - was out of memory
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] OT: NSA: Do they or don't they
(2) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Caching - was out of memory
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(3) bad apple
Re: [LUG] OT: NSA: Do they or don't they
(2) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(0) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Caching - was out of memory
(1) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Caching - was out of memory
(0) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] OT: NSA: Do they or don't they
(0) Adrian Midgley
Re: [LUG] OT: NSA: Do they or don't they
(2) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(0) Paul Sutton
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(1) Simon Avery
Re: [LUG] OT: NSA: Do they or don't they
(1) Martijn Grooten
[LUG] Lug meets
(3) Paul Sutton
Re: [LUG] [ExeterLUG] Lug meets
(1) Martijn Grooten
[LUG] software freedom day
(0) Paul Sutton
[LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY soon.
(6) Tom Brough
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(2) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(0) Paul Sutton
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(1) Paul Sutton
Re: [LUG] [ExeterLUG] Lug meets
(0) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(1) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(2) Simon Avery
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(0) Tom Brough
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(3) Tom Brough
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(1) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(0) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(0) Tom
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(1) Neil Stone
Re: [LUG] [ExeterLUG] Lug meets
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(1) Tom Brough
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(1) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(1) Tom Brough
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(1) Tom Brough
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(0) Neil Stone
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(1) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(1) Neil Stone
[LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or don'
(3) Tom
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(1) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(1) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] Power supplies - do they have
(1) Mark Evans
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(1) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(0) Simon Avery
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(1) Paul Sutton
Re: [LUG] OT: NSA: Do they or don't they
(1) Mark Evans
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(1) Simon Avery
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or
(1) Paul Sutton
Re: [LUG] OT: NSA: Do they or don't they
(0) Mark Evans
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(0) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(3) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(0) Tom
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(0) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(1) Neil
Re: [LUG] OT: NSA: Do they or don't they
(0) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] [ExeterLUG] Lug meets
(0) raymond.knowles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(1) Brad Rogers
[LUG] SFD Request: Volunteer(s) to opera
(1) Tom Brough
Re: [LUG] SFD Request: Volunteer(s) to o
(1) Neil Stone
Re: [LUG] SFD Request: Volunteer(s) to o
(0) Tom Brough
Re: [LUG] SFD Request: Volunteer(s) to o
(1) Rhys Stevens
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(1) Simon Avery
Re: [LUG] SFD Request: Volunteer(s) to o
(0) Tom Brough
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(0) Adrian Midgley
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(0) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Separate Home Partition
(0) Neil
[LUG] Using a remote printer - part 2
(2) Neil
Re: [LUG] Using a remote printer - part
(0) Paul Sutton
Re: [LUG] Using a remote printer - part
(1) bad apple
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(1) bad apple
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(1) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] Using a remote printer - part
(0) Neil Winchurst
Re: [LUG] Power supplies - do they have
(0) George Parker
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(0) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(2) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(0) Simon Avery
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(1) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(1) Tom
[LUG] Secure social media (was: DIY, NSA
(2) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] Secure social media (was: DIY,
(0) Grant Phillips-Sewell
Re: [LUG] Secure social media
(0) Tom
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(2) Martijn Grooten
[LUG] IPSEC and BULLRUN
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] IPSEC and BULLRUN
(1) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] IPSEC and BULLRUN
(0) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(0) Tom
[LUG] mikutter
(1) Brad Rogers
Re: [LUG] mikutter
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] mikutter
(1) Brad Rogers
Re: [LUG] mikutter
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] mikutter
(1) Brad Rogers
Re: [LUG] mikutter
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] mikutter
(0) Brad Rogers
[LUG] Recent Motorola/MS trial shock hor
(0) Tom
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(0) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Software Freedom Day is VERY s
(0) Tom Brough
Re: [LUG] DIY :Re: OT: NSA: Do they or d
(0) Kai Hendry
Re: [LUG] Lug meets
(0) Rob Beard
[LUG] the H
(1) alex mclennan
[LUG] A Web of Trust people might use?
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] the H
(0) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] A Web of Trust people might us
(0) Martijn Grooten
[LUG] HTC Desire Reboot
(1) Henry Bremridge
[LUG] Follow up Question: Android
(1) Henry Bremridge
Re: [LUG] HTC Desire Reboot
(1) Grant Phillips-Sewell
Re: [LUG] OT: NSA: Do they or don't they
(0) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] Follow up Question: Android
(1) Kevin Peat
Re: [LUG] HTC Desire Reboot
(1) jvc260w
Re: [LUG] HTC Desire Reboot
(0) Henry Bremridge
[LUG] SIP calls via Asterisk through NAT
(2) Rob Beard
Re: [LUG] Follow up Question: Android
(0) Wills Fidell
Re: [LUG] SIP calls via Asterisk through
(1) stinga
Re: [LUG] SIP calls via Asterisk through
(1) Rob Beard
Re: [LUG] SIP calls via Asterisk through
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] SIP calls via Asterisk through
(0) Rob Beard
Re: [LUG] SIP calls via Asterisk through
(1) stinga
Re: [LUG] SIP calls via Asterisk through
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] SIP calls via Asterisk through
(1) stinga
Re: [LUG] SIP calls via Asterisk through
(1) Gordon Henderson
[LUG] Thoughts on crypto engineering
(2) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Thoughts on crypto engineering
(0) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] Thoughts on crypto engineering
(1) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Thoughts on crypto engineering
(1) Philip Hudson
[LUG] "Don't trust me, I might be a spoo
(0) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Thoughts on crypto engineering
(1) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Thoughts on crypto engineering
(1) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] Thoughts on crypto engineering
(1) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Thoughts on crypto engineering
(1) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] Thoughts on crypto engineering
(0) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] SIP calls via Asterisk through
(0) stinga
[LUG] Hello World
(4) Tremayne, Steve
Re: [LUG] Hello World
(1) Neil Winchurst
Re: [LUG] Hello World
(0) Tremayne, Steve
Re: [LUG] Hello World
(1) alex mclennan
Re: [LUG] Hello World
(0) Tremayne, Steve
Re: [LUG] Hello World
(1) Neil Stone
Re: [LUG] Hello World
(1) Eion MacDonald
Re: [LUG] Hello World
(0) Tremayne, Steve
[LUG] =)
(1) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] =)
(0) Paul Sutton
Re: [LUG] Hello World
(0) Paul Sutton
[LUG] eden project beer festival
(0) Paul Sutton
[LUG] UPS
(1) Neil Stone
[LUG] Gordon is famous
(1) Richard Brown
Re: [LUG] Gordon is famous
(1) Gordon Henderson
[LUG] NIST? Bust.
(0) Philip Hudson
[LUG] paignton meeting
(1) Paul Sutton
[LUG] Holsworthy meeting
(0) Neil Winchurst
Re: [LUG] paignton meeting
(0) raymond.knowles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: [LUG] Gordon is famous
(0) Richard Brown
[LUG] What the NSA just declassified and
(0) Philip Hudson
[LUG] LMDE repo error
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] LMDE repo error
(2) Rob Beard
Re: [LUG] LMDE repo error
(0) Tom
Re: [LUG] LMDE repo error
(0) Philip Hudson
[LUG] zfs
(2) bad apple
Re: [LUG] zfs
(0) Rob Beard
[LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wifi h
(1) Henry Bremridge
Re: [LUG] zfs
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(2) Henry Bremridge
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(3) Rob Beard
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(0) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(0) Henry Bremridge
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(0) Grant Phillips-Sewell
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(1) Rob Beard
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(1) Simon Waters
Re: [LUG] UPS
(0) Rhys Stevens
[LUG] Survey if we want a Fab Lab in cen
(2) Trevor Sharp
Re: [LUG] Survey if we want a Fab Lab in
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] Survey if we want a Fab Lab in
(0) Simon Waters
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] zfs
(0) Tremayne, Steve
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(1) Tremayne, Steve
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(1) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] Survey if we want a Fab Lab in
(2) Trevor Sharp
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(1) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Survey if we want a Fab Lab in
(0) Tom
[LUG] exeter raspberry pi jam
(0) Paul Sutton
Re: [LUG] Survey if we want a Fab Lab in
(0) Tremayne, Steve
[LUG] RSA what?
(2) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] RSA what?
(1) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] RSA what?
(1) Simon Waters
Re: [LUG] RSA what?
(0) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] RSA what?
(1) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] RSA what?
(1) Simon Waters
Re: [LUG] RSA what?
(1) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] Battery powered 3G modems / Wi
(0) Daniel Robinson
[LUG] Exete Raspberry Jam 12th October
(0) Simon Belshaw
[LUG] Software freedom day
(0) Paul Sutton
[LUG] Listen to the radio?!
(0) Daniel Robinson
Re: [LUG] RSA what?
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] RSA what?
(1) Simon Waters
Re: [LUG] RSA what?
(1) Adrian Midgley
Re: [LUG] [Bulk] Re: RSA what?
(1) Philip Whateley
[LUG] OT: 13 principles against unchecke
(0) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] [Bulk] Re: RSA what?
(0) Martijn Grooten
[LUG] SFD....
(1) Tom Brough
Re: [LUG] SFD....
(1) Paul Sutton
[LUG] easycap somagic dc60
(0) Tom
[LUG] easycap somagic dc60 --sorted
(0) Tom
[LUG] USB write permissions - best prac
(3) Tom
[LUG] Who's using broken proprietary cry
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] USB write permissions - best
(1) bad apple
Re: [LUG] USB write permissions - best
(2) Tom
Re: [LUG] USB write permissions - best
(1) lhs47crewe
Re: [LUG] USB write permissions - best
(0) bad apple
Re: [LUG] USB write permissions - best p
(0) Robin Cornelius
Re: [LUG] USB write permissions - best
(0) Mike Grant
Re: [LUG] USB write permissions - best
(1) bad apple
Re: [LUG] USB write permissions - best
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] USB write permissions - best p
(0) Simon Avery
Re: [LUG] Who's using broken proprietary
(1) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] Who's using broken proprietary
(1) bad apple
Re: [LUG] Who's using broken proprietary
(0) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] SFD....
(0) Daniel Robinson
[LUG] Secure text source in the cloud
(0) Philip Hudson
[LUG] Britain's GCHQ Hacked Belgian Tele
(1) Paul Sutton
Re: [LUG] Britain's GCHQ Hacked Belgian
(0) Martijn Grooten
[LUG] Kirk
(1) Philip Hudson
[LUG] SteamOS
(1) Rob Beard
[LUG] OT: Freeview
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] SteamOS
(0) Kevin Peat
Re: [LUG] OT: Freeview
(2) Kevin Lucas
Re: [LUG] Kirk
(0) Martinus Scriblerus
Re: [LUG] OT: Freeview
(0) Tom
Re: [LUG] OT: Freeview
(0) Tom
[LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) Kevin Peat
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) jvc260w
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) Tremayne, Steve
[LUG] Germany loves ubuntu...
(1) Simon Avery
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) Simon Waters
Re: [LUG] Germany loves ubuntu...
(1) Kevin Peat
Re: [LUG] Germany loves ubuntu...
(1) Martijn Grooten
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) George Parker
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) lug
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) lug
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) Tom
[LUG] Proposal to develop a Fab Lab / Ma
(1) Simon Belshaw
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(2) Rob Beard
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) Tom
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(2) Gordon Henderson
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(0) Tom
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(0) Rob Beard
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(1) lug
Re: [LUG] Rooting the Hudl
(0) Rob Beard
[LUG] Phones
(1) Neil Stone
Re: [LUG] Phones
(1) Simon Waters
Re: [LUG] Phones
(1) George Parker
Re: [LUG] Phones
(1) Rob Beard
Re: [LUG] Phones
(1) George Parker
Re: [LUG] Phones
(2) Rob Beard
Re: [LUG] Germany loves ubuntu...
(0) Eion MacDonald
[LUG] OT: TRESOR runs encryption securel
(0) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Phones
(1) Brad Rogers
Re: [LUG] Phones
(1) Rob Beard
Re: [LUG] Phones
(0) Brad Rogers
Re: [LUG] Phones
(1) Simon Waters
[LUG] Fwd: GNU turn thirty!
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Phones
(0) Daniel Case
Re: [LUG] GNU turn thirty!
(1) Philip Hudson
[LUG] Hacking a laptop
(1) Richard Brown
Re: [LUG] Hacking a laptop
(1) Neil Stone
[LUG] RMS on "Service as a Software Subs
(0) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Hacking a laptop
(0) Richard Brown
Re: [LUG] GNU turn thirty!
(0) Roland Tarver
[LUG] Cyber reservist anyone?!
(1) Roland Tarver
Re: [LUG] Cyber reservist anyone?!
(0) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Proposal to develop a Fab Lab
(0) Jaan Janesmae
[LUG] Free software pour les flics... bo
(1) Philip Hudson
Re: [LUG] Free software pour les flics..
(0) Tom