[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:05:27 +0000 Simon Avery <digdilem@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What is outright dangerous is the seeming requirement to reduce > personal security for everyone to monitor the few. This is great news > for criminals with such amazing data stores potentially available at > every ISP. > > One wonders if the snooper's charter will require https/ssl security > to allow gchq to access these files, or submit them, or whatever? I read recently that the only secure computer is one that is a) Not connected to the internet b) Switched off and c) Buried six feet under. Otherwise, 100% security? Forget it. Neil -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq