[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
> On 30 Nov 2013, at 18:35, bad apple <mr.meowski@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > workplace rules applied to him, and hit upon DNS tunnelling: yeah, like > I hadn't thought of that. Although not a lot of folks are tracking it routinely other than snort signatures for same. Probably an area where your own protocol might easily escape attention, just don't use your own encryption with it. For malicious purposes DNS must still be a good choice. Especially now every protocol and its dog is storing key data in the DNS, it is getting harder to eyeball the data and say "no" on content alone. A big chunk of encoded data would have been pretty unusual in the past, but now far less so. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq