[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Hi All, Yes, BT continues to be pathetic. When I received a string of nuisance calls from a number in Preston, BT's response was to sign me up to "Choose to Refuse". What they should have done is terminate the account of the nuisance caller, as is their legal right. But because the caller spends a considerable amount of money with them, they fobbed me off with choose to refuse, at extra cost to me of course. Now I have terminated the choose to refuse, and will refer all nuisance call instances to Ofcom or Otelo, or whatever they are called this week. Fellow LUG members, don't be conned the way I was. Raymond Knowles. >---- Original Message---- >From: simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Date: 18/02/2011 20:53 >To: <list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subj: Re: [LUG] Comical phone call. MS vs Linux & Malware. > >On 18/02/11 20:38, Kevin Lucas wrote: >> >> He had to change all his Bank details and saved passwords for login as >> after telling his Bank about his, ( and asking for the Money back), >> which he got. > >This is probably worth publicising. Since the credit card companies, and >banks, will suspend accounts eventually, particularly under public pressure. > >BTs response to abusive calls from overseas was particular pathetic last >time I spoke to them, which consisted basically of "change your number" >or "block all overseas calls" ?! Welcome to the 21st century guys, you'd >think they'd have some more sophisticated scheme in place to deal with >abusive phone calls by now. Guess backward compatibility carries a huge >cost... > >-- >The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG >http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list>FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq > -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq