[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] EU ruling on Google
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] EU ruling on Google
- From: Philip Hudson <phil.hudson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:26:17 +0100
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcglug.org.uk; s=1396810045; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID:Date:From:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version; bh=lSBd3Pl1BtnJNiEtq+x67Ily2FRnKeca4F0I3nWUDP0=; b=KJljMxXZNJkTgdBshnCnwBEqOWefQcyXmfokwcqdLizU60dU1y6kT/of38KSYxIeBDgK7ifiZH1RmcKEJc2zE+QLu6/jc2bq2We9zE+27rvDM2zx4erkTxlAwOMv2CFFaxLDB6PK0kfrriYuZijom9aIRtGhQM8gRsJUcLarjhs=;
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=Aadw/gtqQPBb6s9+7rGVnqjb5ZlSpcKXjRtKkiEuS+Q=; b=rNBwUXLBySzKQdqxmlgMACpfFHu2CuTUwXs+RPDT5LSAlN/p0X+Xs02KCQwHWP6UB4 HLtFd/K3Kd+JD5tdxJ5jUZg0wtCtNVFPUuo4TKEyboua64QB9r+ahhy7HIB/hGP73L7x k/kWu5za+EPYUpH76K2D5nAETcd/zyOlMsp2z4KsblcpMjgHiVPIuIdPE5AJhqRBTT1p jbDHytNilh7PIkztSC7kGxV4QFTqgL57qm7u2d8NCZUKlHlBKbH7VmFc73TCPoAVowSG 18DwHBPcCApN71LTxSEd70+aAuX8NVkSyKFgTTU7HQKaxe6Q2Mq63AWpcqrazkutoHHn ymTA==
On 19 May 2014 23:59, Simon Waters <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The court simply made a daft decision, it is possible it is the only
> ruling consistent with European law, so they may have felt they had no
> choice but to make a daft ruling. But I think patently daft, and I find
> it hard to see how that isn't obvious.
Oh, it was obvious to me immediately as well. Too obvious, which is
what made me go back and re-examine my initial reaction. Maybe I then
over-thought it, but at this point I still don't think so.
I think "indexer" and "data processor" is a difference without a
well-grounded distinction, so I dismiss that aspect from
consideration. Am I missing something?
It does seem to me ultimately to be at least in significant part an
issue of software freedom.
--
Phil Hudson http://hudson-it.no-ip.biz
@UWascalWabbit PGP/GnuPG ID: 0x887DCA63
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
