[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] SPF was Re: Linux - viruses etc
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] SPF was Re: Linux - viruses etc
- From: Martijn Grooten <sweetwatergeek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:37:52 +0000
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=NOKJcAW8iP7+YOzNMuiZs7cotyamZhD3rjsqkDxcZcs=; b=WUxMoA1gRm3N8bERacK+4VVQGrXKlhuJ/ZUVz4S2zD0hsDei4hjGjKCYOZIjSHZHOg YjDKQ/6WmWhtNDR144HmRI6dm7blNZLPXbxHXRNSjc75bRna99o1e6HWvHBoNOan+itA WRgiV1b2/cQkrjc9fmtJGYIc84XhbvtvZsnlOIJnI9141ISsvcBs1M6qw/a33JWJTxVV rDYwYMzNbs3sjLQA6sBlAfB4pOezZBiTPdIfdidxAroOdAaNTrL0BLT5pwmZN9Rt/GWE +uAyjBV0XiPEJPwPZ4vK28IwjRmnOdX/FOH/2bioXIk4ISZtn6o0WH0/18of9rMeuJtH gQwA==
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Kai Hendry <hendry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7 February 2013 12:54, Simon Waters <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Almost no one rejects on SPF hard fail because it gives too many false
>> positives.
>
> What does false positives mean here? That mail classed as spam is not
> actually spam?
That. So in this case, legitimate mail that fails SPF checks and thus
is incorrectly blocked because of that.
Martijn.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
