[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] SPF was Re: Linux - viruses etc
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] SPF was Re: Linux - viruses etc
- From: Kai Hendry <hendry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:35:27 +0800
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VqNe5WwRE7cOysc7sF+9LoWkz3I+IM2Q9Rvm1lplr6s=; b=ao+iCkOY/iftkvuEuk42IoM8JgExHFdyVsfKmUGfAWArRvYFs5jih2s6eIKyqDwGTQ 5uXbtC1UC2lkiqyfnc1Gytmye0N9XU2Zk9ZnSVgHv4PfhtiP3O43Gl6RptO/n6oT+Smb ZDHpME6BLgQ2BGa/s84/0Ysyd9MmTnFoMIpwsJdXj6oBrP6PsiKNnsRrdGYBt/to5jvH tEYWfn8c1t2bKdPbhxn4XxBFRFcKWd5vBynD7MYdQZbIKUhHg5SzdmetRwApUfR8I5HY F4rbxqGXi3GZDQR/fxzP46Oa5g41BZEzzPC083wgEdgOZrssCFPwagX+wb26TD3ztqdH DldA==
On 7 February 2013 12:54, Simon Waters <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Almost no one rejects on SPF hard fail because it gives too many false
> positives.
What does false positives mean here? That mail classed as spam is not
actually spam?
Or mail classed as good, which isn't actually good.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
