D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] I feel like Pipex are trying to con me...

 

John Hansen writes:
> Gordon Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, jon.davey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I recently requested a house move from Pipex. It all sounded simple 
>>> 'till
>>> they phoned to inform me that a fault had been reported on the new 
>>> line and
>>> that they'd need to send a BT enginear, which would cost me £80. I 
>>> spoke to
>>> my, now wife, and she said the the line was/is fine. So I phoned Pipex
>>> customer care and told them that there is no need for the enginear to 
>>> come
>>> as the line is fine. They sent the BT guy, he was here for less the five
>>> minuts and low and behold the line is fine. I call Pipex back to make 
>>> sure I
>>> wasn't going to be charged as I had informed them that the line was fine
>>> beforehand and was reasured that I wouldn't be charged for the call out.
>>>    Yesterday I had a call telling me I have an outstanding bill of 
>>> £88.00
>>> for a BT enginear. I get angry. Then it takes a good half hour for me 
>>> to get
>>> it into the head of the customer service person that I told them they 
>>> didn't
>>> need to send the enginear, they said I wouldn't have to pay but now,
>>> apparently, I have to pay.
>>
>> If the bill was from BT, then Pipex (hopefully) won't see any of it. 
>>
>> Challenge BT - if it's BT who's billing you. Tell them you 
>> specifically told Pipex that the line was fine and to not send an 
>> engineer. Put this in writing and via a phone call to BT, and copy all 
>> correspondance to Pipex. Also challenge pipex. You probably won't get 
>> anywhere though, but it might make you feel better. Tell them you're 
>> going to invoice them for the BT charge. 
>>
...I did try to challenge them.
>> I don't suppose you recorded your calls, did you? (If so, don't use 
>> the recording direct, but write a transcript of it) 
>>
...They aparently have records of the calls and are investigating it. 

>> Then phone pipex and ask for a MAC and take you business elsewhere. 
>> There are plenty more ISPs to choose from with better (and cheaper) 
>> service.
I'm very tempted. Why do I need the MAC address?
>>
>>>   Call me paranoid but I got the distinct feeling that Pipex are out 
>>> to try
>>> to squeese as much money out of me as they can and as for "customer 
>>> service"
>>> she just seemed intent on keeping me on the phone for as long as 
>>> possible.
>>
>> Was it an 084x or 087x number? They can earn 1p a minute from 084 
>> number and at least 4p a minute off 0870 numbers

They have both 0845 and 0870 numbers. This one happened to be 0845 but I was 
kept on it for near to an HOUR.
>>>   I felt powerless and like I was in 1984.  I remember asking about 
>>> ISP's
>>> here and I seem to recall being warned against Pipex as they, 
>>> efectively,
>>> were becomming Tiscali. Which they now are. Am I right in thinking my 
>>> ISP
>>> are not very nice and also not very helpfull?....or is it just me?
>>
>> Once upon a time, Pipex was a good name in the ISP business. That was 
>> c1996 when I was working in the ISP "industry" ... These days they've 
>> been taken over, bought out, bought in, sent back, lost, found and 
>> finally buried for 3 months and recycled as firelighters...
>> Gordon
Thanks Gordon, I don't really need any firelighters. I do think I'll ditch 
them!
> If writing to BT and Pipex I recommend you send your letters addressed to:
> "The Company Secretary" at these comapnies.
> I had trouble with BT last year and got a speedy response having written to
> The Company Secretary.
> This position is mandatory for limited companies so they all have such 
> an individual
> who report to the Board.
> John W
...Interesting. Thanks. 



-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html