[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:35:17 +0100 Anton Channing wrote:
Sorry, there's no substitute for learning HTML to write a website. WYSIWYG just doesn't work. You don't see what you get, you don't get a valid page, so no-one else gets to see what you wanted either.I agree. Its not like its difficult or requires any programming skills to write html documents, its only mark up. My girlfriend was a technophobe when I met her back in 2000, but now she does the html and css for her own website. She isn't w3c compliant, although she is most of the way there. At least most of the way to 4.01 transitional, which is a good start. :) As for editors, I quite like KATE, it is a glorified text editor (which is all you need), and has nice colour coding and can do bulk tab and un-tab on selections.
Quanta also does this bulk tabbing... surprising how the little things are sometimes the most useful. I also quite like the way Quanta auto-closes tags when you type </ and presents a nice pop-down list of valid tag parameters. Grant. -- Artificial intelligence is no match for nuratal stidutipy. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe. FAQ: www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html