[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] DATABASE FOR LINUX
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] DATABASE FOR LINUX
- From: Mark Mitchell <m.l.mitchell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 12:52:21 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=oyXU4hGRWvp3xro58cIMdZjR0MF0z1WmILmOlJuUgjfpOgTpnoErN+gWvlCAs6eYDY7IoGN3YEF4gZx3Ma87rT2FDgbZnMpKVsZb3TReg4fMrJ1ed/Sxaxk9eH38QNePeZCAi9dnp/dNWAdSsg/RqejwhcjVVyZsXd8M7DjP0o0=
- Reply-to: list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 12:20:01 +0000, Neil Winchurst
There is no equivalent to Access or Paradox available on Linux.
There are databases, of course, but they have two big problems. One,
they are based on SQL, which I do not like at all.
Access is SQL based - or at least based on the MS version of same.
Don't know about Paradox however (never heard of it).
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.