D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

[LUG]Re: UK online Safety Act

 

Thanks for this, I am an admin on the Matrix channel along with Dom (Shymega) but I am there more often. But Dom knows far more about Matrix then I do.

As this is also bridged to IRC then that should cover both, we can see all messages.

As for reading messages on the list, it is hardly busy here as you know, at the best of times, in fact this is the busiest it has been for ages.

I am not sure who the 'Officers are' I know Alex C is the mailing list admin and Simon W maintains the website back end. I just try (badly) to add content now and then. I have put a note on the site re Matrix and the age policy.

Thanks for this,  should really help.

Paul


On 28/08/2025 21:04, John Harris via list wrote:
I'll go a step further. I volunteer to put the paperwork in order for the LUG and to be the UK Online Safety Compliance Officer for as long as required, and I'll make the same offer to Carmen. Having done it once it's not great leap to two more. If that's acceptable it will be an entirely email-mediated process, including training of the LUG officers and any moderators who may exist. I can't believe the LUG has one. Moderation is twofold, oversight and reactive, we need at least one named oversight moderator who reads all the traffic. That covers the entire legal demand, so long as people take me seriously if I ever declare there's a problem.






On 28/08/2025 20:53, John Harris via list wrote:
I chose to tick the boxes. I'm confident any events would be dealt with by the procedures I put in place and the training I can be seen to have performed. And nobody is going to legislate against VPN use - the words are practically meaningless. The LUG is covered it it puts the procedures in place. The procedures depend on reporting and clearly if the LUG had a report it would implement the procedure. There is no breach of any law in operating that way, the LUG continues as before with children if that's the choice of the LUG and the requests of the hypothetical children. And certainly engaging with Mission:Libre in the UK would involve exactly the same process. Nothing in the OSA prohibits engagement with children of any age, it simply demands that processes exist for reporting and follow-up in the event of an incident along with all the other safety aspects which react to "terror" - and I believe even discussing that sort of matter in the current climate is unsafe.






On 28/08/2025 20:42, Paul Sutton via list wrote:
So what are we meant to do as a small LUG just cease to exist?  I saw on LinkedIn about VPNs,  I think if it was up to the children's commissioner VPNs would require age checks,   yeah go figure how that would work.

Paul


On 28/08/2025 20:20, John Harris via list wrote:
With regard to enforcement, Ofcom is proactively contacting any number of sites to bully them into action on OSA adherence. I've not heard of them doing anything at all once a site is conformant. It's a tick-the- box issue so far, much like the Information Commissioner. Then you get the same treatment if you come to their attention is an incident - you're in a lot more trouble if you didn't conform to the initial paperwork. One needs to be large enough for them to know you exist, but then you can always end up as a headline.







On 28/08/2025 19:51, Paul Sutton via list wrote:
Hi, Thanks for this.  I agree here, I don't really like discord that much either.

I think Carmen is looking at self hosting services for this including jitsi. I think it may be difficult to begin with.  I am just trying to help / support this initiative and also the lug in general, so not sure what to do.

As I said before we have had teens on the lug before and I think as a group we have helped them almost as much as they have helped us. We may still have teens here, or adults with teenagers who use Linux or are interested in related topics.

I can see the OSA et-al making a lot more things difficult while not actually addressing the issues. Especially if as people have said it is not very enforceable.

Lets see what happens and if anyone here or in our wider communities has suggestions as to how young people can be included then ideas are welcome, that means here or elsewhere.

Paul

On 28/08/2025 19:35, WaiTsun Yeung wrote:
If Matrix is unavailable, I would like to add my two cents about using Discord for online youth meetups.

I understand Discord is quite popular for my age group (20s-30s) and the younger generation (I use it myself on a daily basis), but it has a history of adults in Discord groups posing as teenagers trying to influence the sexual behaviours of actual teenagers. And private Discord groups actually make it harder to monitor and report than open ones.

/Best regards,/
/William (he/his/him)/
/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/ /​If you find this email at any odd hour, weekend, or holiday, it is because it works with my schedule at this time of the week or because I am sending it from the opposite end of the Earth. //So that// you know, you are not expected to reply outside / regular/ working hours!/

2025年8月28日(木) 18:54 Paul Sutton via list <list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>:

    On 28/08/2025 15:05, Paul Sutton via list wrote:
     > Thanks Dan,  that is very helpful,  I feel more confident about
    being
     > able to promote.
     >
     > End of the day,  this is a friendly, inclusive community, helpful      > community and I really want the LUG to thrive where others have
    fallen
     > off the radar.
     >
     > Re ID verification, the only time I can think of this is or was
    relevant
     > is when we used to do key signing,  and that was rare.
     >
     >
     > Thanks again
     >
     > Paul

    By a rather spooky coincidence, I just spotted this on the Matrix.org
    official account.

    We have updated our Homeserver Terms and Privacy Policy. We strongly     encourage you to read these documents in full, but for clarity these
    are
    some of the main changes:

          Updated the minimum age requirements for use of the Matrix.org
    Homeserver to be 18 years old;
          Introduced new measures to comply with our obligations under the
    Online Safety Act and the Digital Services Act;
          Introduced new payment terms to support paid plans on the
    Matrix.org Homeserver;
          Describe the new data processors to support paid plans on the
    Matrix.org Homeserver.

    Each of the documents has a detailed version history which we encourage     you to review. The updated Homeserver Terms and Privacy Policy take     effect on 7 August, 2025. These terms apply to you by continuing to use
    the homeserver after that date. If you have any questions please
    drop us
    an email to legal@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:legal@xxxxxxxxxx>

    Matrix.org Homeserver Terms - @matrixdotorg
    Matrix, the open protocol for secure decentralised communications
    https://matrix.org/legal/terms-and-conditions/ <https:// matrix.org/
    legal/terms-and-conditions/>

    Matrix.org Foundation Privacy Policy - @matrixdotorg
    Matrix, the open protocol for secure decentralised communications
    https://matrix.org/legal/privacy-notice/ <https://matrix.org/ legal/
    privacy-notice/>

    So just sharing here.

    Paul


     >
     >
     > On 28/08/2025 14:55, Dan Dart wrote:
     >> Nothing I can see prevents young people taking part in this.
    There's
     >> nothing overtly adult or over-18 about the subject, a general "all
     >> audiences" theme is good enough.
     >>
     >> OSA is actually unenforceable internationally/globally (violates a      >> bunch of human rights to privacy and security amongst other things)      >> and is not relevant to general audience groups - there's nothing we
     >> require identity verification for.
     >>
     >> It's already being worn down and will have to exist at a far
    smaller
     >> scope than the people who invented it wants it to, if at all.
     >>
     >> Written to you by human brain and organic thought,
     >>
     >> Dan Dart
     >> _____
     >> M: (+44) (0)75 075 91874
     >> Callsign: M0ORI
     >> Software Engineer, Radio Ham, Musician
     >>
     >> On Thu, 28 Aug 2025, 12:30 Paul Sutton via list,
    <list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     >> <mailto:list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
     >>
     >>     Hi All
     >>
     >>     Just asking a question here regarding the UK Online Safety
    Act,  does
     >>     this actually prevent young people from taking part in
    activities
     >> such
     >>     as Mission Libre, and perhaps even joining groups such as this.
     >>
     >>     It would be useful to know where people stand on a range of
    issues in
     >>     respect of the act.
     >>
     >>     Paul
     >>
     >>     --     Paul Sutton, Cert Cont Sci (Open)
     >> https://zleap.net/ <https://zleap.net/> <https://zleap.net/
    <https://zleap.net/>>
     >>     Mastodon : @zleap@xxxxxxxx <mailto:zleap@xxxxxxxx>
    <mailto:zleap@xxxxxxxx <mailto:zleap@xxxxxxxx>>
     >>
     >>     --     The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
     >>     FAQ: https://www.dcglug.org.uk/faq/ <https://
    www.dcglug.org.uk/faq/> <https://www.dcglug.org.uk/faq/ <https://
    www.dcglug.org.uk/faq/>>
     >>
     >>
     >

    --     Paul Sutton, Cert Cont Sci (Open)
    https://zleap.net/ <https://zleap.net/>
    Mastodon : @zleap@xxxxxxxx <mailto:zleap@xxxxxxxx>
    --     The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
    FAQ: https://www.dcglug.org.uk/faq/ <https:// www.dcglug.org.uk/ faq/>







--
Paul Sutton, Cert Cont Sci (Open)
https://zleap.net/
Mastodon : @zleap@xxxxxxxx
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
FAQ: https://www.dcglug.org.uk/faq/