[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...
From: Tom via list <list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:03:33 +0000
Cc: Tom <madtom1999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-language: en-GB
Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcglug.org.uk; s=1602234361; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Reply-To:From:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post :List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID: References:To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MWo/6DnACeY9SIIAB6Pxaz4IzFm4n+OWC/ZSSPgG7Y0=; b=afyY8LDbw4ULP/Ne9BeUy6Ur5 huVq80T9fJCCXaAd5mHsylWMB5NDeIv0+Nmplotsv1rJ17e9CLK6VlG+nG6px1yVcwRImEC6C5Es8 p+QV3cg2bk9Jq2zPqDPAIZamvUK+LOwoXaB+WMrHSOzLV8vb1/YEKTTXw7WZ9jEwkh9JA=;
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=QW7hW/PQo50T5zrK8BUQwKFDgnQyGMIAJkZOXjLZ4gg=; b=rXInTdgmLU7z4TvC2v4HXf+avPpldstX+w+tMlmC/o7i+3xsQwpnnOkOXKeJhwl0Bm Sl67bbrfwyDWVEwYeAk21nm3+MTynIm5jyrsHSu1JusrcnKlCMOrZR624xu7WpDR29W5 MSrLU/DvoYpTJ9OccYXXnwcL4Ifx+3Y8+lj4O4kqTsJkbwY9uKi+M1rkOd6g0YR2MEDV KGpfrwkyOFkKEQlNGkOLlQttPec3LE7xNA3/2C3w3nqcTjQttT4NAzj/PrLtAD3YdiPa VLK5TX08InGhdmw8uy5bl0ILUypALBScXk3x2WkF61tNjnaxs5s9UvwPrtKWxmA+vM7i 3ZSg==

On 12/12/2020 13:52, Sebastian wrote:

Dear Simon,

Redhat making a big thing of "We'll soften the blow by not preventing
anyone continuing to re-package RHEL and distribute how they like" is
particularly disingenuous and annoying, since they can't. RHEL is built on
free software protected by licences. Mighty give of them to allow what is
legally mandatory, eh?

My thought exactly when I read the article. Red Hat have built a
towering citadel on foundations of free software, thus, anyone who is
let in gets to distribute keys to the gates.

Best wishes, Sebastian
- Freenode: 'seabass'

https://www.theregister.com/2020/12/15/centos_alternatives/


Tom te tom te tom


--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
https://mailman.dcglug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq

Follow-up: Re: [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Simon Avery

References:
- [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...
  - From: Sebastian
- Re: [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...
  - From: Simon Avery
- Re: [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...
  - From: comrade meowski
- Re: [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...
  - From: Simon Avery
- Re: [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...
  - From: comrade meowski
- Re: [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...
  - From: Simon Avery
- Re: [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...
  - From: Sebastian

Prev by Date: Re: [LUG] Moving Emails
Next by Date: Re: [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...
Previous by thread: Re: [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...
Next by thread: Re: [LUG] It's CentOS, Jim, but not as we know it...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread