[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] Static analysis of Lua
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] Static analysis of Lua
- From: Simon Waters <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 21:05:37 +0100
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcglug.org.uk; s=1396810045; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=xI+irXLVfFvYD7Til9+TIIf9nHaJehz+iGqzND2aiD0=; b=pXa0LuybnH4a1gLH2Op2mTW7Ws7pHC9xTihVrWhEYXfjsPFbKBND0Q2+3A5EUw3i1Y5tR+BYu088uHSnQyqnOW9os8FmKoWsiZmgXp8Byrf7jvRvrJFofgU76UrjaSivGwTVQY2bVzP6iMT1uSbP61Snp8SOHQ9SRaI/GvJaR7M=;
- Openpgp: id=8F455606
On 09/05/14 08:20, Philip Hudson wrote:
>
> Have you seen this?
>
> statically analysing Lua code for potential errors - Stack Overflow
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/866266/statically-analysing-lua-code-for-potential-errors
Yes, but basically only one of the programs mentions that I've tried
appears to be maintained to the. Even then it is predominantly looking
for variable name typos and scoping errors, all good stuff to detect,
but a long way behind where most language tools get you.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq