[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] OT surveillance
- To: DCLUG ML <list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [LUG] OT surveillance
- From: Philip Hudson <phil.hudson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:12:18 +0100
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; bh=cv+kOn7117EKyelpc1HT5j53i+TxdoBe7/6HGrOku2k=; b=bqdPalJIFR1NkAsKLaAqomJ+99rjK5CusdCeeBL5ft6DTyGvLRWVtxYASVSCbZ9A6e UqSUITbGsxQ0oD981bVuRylCUWfvnyR34n3w2igG4OYFTDpxbzFsD7LyB0c0wlb0LFZO pgpBDHh4dsvOzwLef+3mzoPqlxR6gALY6ISpcJfHGbVKH1ZXyolGSbgnoT+IjpdXknnz 5b4CSnY+seEbvaye0RmAjN8ExKpY2hJ2k+BnqcthaTjJ6ZPYyjxCwmvi1xGpFdF4w8hG XJj07bDAZwhInbuhX7gxs9Ajh4e37Gsi9dQjiHJ7uNUeLLRyN5V/NqR+f4HBZ3O8kBNS joTw==
On 26 Jun, 2013, at 1:16 pm, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:06:59 +0100
Philip Hudson <phil.hudson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Or to put it more simply: never mind if it's legal or not. Is it
constitutional?
Without a legally acknowledged constitution, it's tricky to be
(un)constitutional.
Indeed. The great advantage to our rulers of the UK's vaunted
"unwritten" constitution is that it simply disappears when convenient
(to them).
--
Phil Hudson http://hudson-it.no-ip.biz
@UWascalWabbit PGP/GnuPG ID: 0x887DCA63
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq