D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Scottish firm pays out £120,000 over unlicensed software

 

Mark Evans wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gordon Henderson wrote:
>   
>> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Rob Beard wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> I'd have thought a company this size would have some sort of Microsoft
>>> licencing agreement in place anyway (whatever it's called these says,
>>> Software Assurance isn't it?)
>>>       
>> It's easy to let things get out of hand - especially given the complexity 
>> of Microsofts licensing schemes, and a growing company. One place I worked
>>     
>
> Complex to the point where it can be impossible to even get a straight
> answer out of Microsoft. That's before you consider upgrades, "downgrade
> rights" and Microsoft changing things apparently at random.
It works in their favour, though.  Make the licensing so complex that 
companies that try to remain legit will often end-up buying more 
licenses than they "need".

Grant.

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html