[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] EU ruling on Google
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] EU ruling on Google
- From: Martijn Grooten <martijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:43:58 +0000
- Content-disposition: inline
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcglug.org.uk; s=1396810045; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:To:From:Date; bh=QW3KYRks0T4hIH+VxaUUBajBHg+ciJcEfNJFatsrubY=; b=UFGMCLsXVJon2xpm5gDTpRmO4sMlG86/keU5UQUsQOt5/V3jUX3XoKACvfLDAUrEjmzcIDm8Kqy5dY9kdHyCzeW+EGYli+rpE4cn/NuYC1pPjrL+aJDcAHbqvnp2VQTzfor5IMFVItCfO+qh3kiAnkE22KYnkM9XE9M6fUMRAwM=;
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lapsedordinary.net; s=mail; t=1400147038; bh=uQC8VZK2qQpuuEm0vflBTQmwpvFSFmD2M2QKmtyOrUg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=iLfuldexESE7QBCMuMkA9yp1YHA50wR2qXAzaJ6dpQVgluilooG1Oxc8GGcwZjC7Q OEx3NVMy4RO8DMq68JaYoNW5w9zI1MpvSuNr5agPeLtm1JgzUiBdfN5qxtqgiJxZZ6 dKMFPhuqb5GAtA2EXMVgSdPwH6QYogzw4WAwCJ20=
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:18:47AM +0100, Kevin Peat wrote:
> I agree with Jimmy Wales that it is ridiculous and impossible to
> implement even in this one specific case let alone as a general rule.
Here's an interesting piece by someone who is in favour of it:
http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/the-right-to-be-forgotten-is-not-censorship/
I'm still worried that this could open the door to some censorship, but
it's good to note that there's another side to the story: Search Engines
do collect, sort and reorganise a lot of personal data. That does invade
people's privacy.
Martijn.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
