[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 15/05/14 10:43, Martijn Grooten wrote:
I dont think it invades peoples privacy in the sense the information is already in the public domain - the info will be in publicly available papers and in many cases an online search of the court records will show he was bankrupt. This information is not incorrect. What will Bing be doing about this - assuming they could find a haystack in a needle box?On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:18:47AM +0100, Kevin Peat wrote:I agree with Jimmy Wales that it is ridiculous and impossible to implement even in this one specific case let alone as a general rule.Here's an interesting piece by someone who is in favour of it: http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/the-right-to-be-forgotten-is-not-censorship/ I'm still worried that this could open the door to some censorship, but it's good to note that there's another side to the story: Search Engines do collect, sort and reorganise a lot of personal data. That does invade people's privacy. Martijn.
Tom te tom te tom -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq