[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] File system for heavy I/O
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] File system for heavy I/O
- From: Martijn Grooten <martijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:49:02 +0000
- Content-disposition: inline
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lapsedordinary.net; s=mail; t=1395676142; bh=qiyjFXAlW/w65kvBooczkotu7BfImh165iZK6yE1SVM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=hNii2I5ZBNFitfgwiWoT8yQARMQBmo5syJ9JHqYymneMat1mSFEbIT9VCMxu/yd8t 0n1yD8fV/qMtJhn/mHNLSGZRHylq7doD8y+LmXiBqyXk0zyLDp4v31UcQ/NSfuaO1B zeKAF5vygtZXX6N/akCvldNXvCRVI0MVgIaG2d6M=
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:48:44PM +0000, Simon Waters wrote:
> However file system is rarely dominant in IO performance.
>
> Sure if everything is perfect, then file system can make a slight
> difference, but they tend to all try and optimize the common cases.
Which of course make sense.
Looks like I'll have to see if I can find some other ways to improve IO
performance. Such as by yet again looking at my code.
Thanks.
Martijn.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
