[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Hardware Encrypted SD

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] Hardware Encrypted SD
From: Simon Avery <digdilem@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 19:21:35 +0000
Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0vkgrxknD1FxZfEHvbIGZdqFq1DaTT/ouUZnf9o09ew=; b=G5Pjhx5mNr2ctsrC9FCdt9M/l/qxqe7xDbWHmm/TcL/2zFiWU4TbYJB3+f+pYrAAbS Hj2tfd3SigEt1x8caDNBg7/xmvtasM6r8JuspKT5V6VMqNBfjBJCwbehwR3WNA9AZu14 kYCJNRv2T6FomGrN33+oq8cvoCmEZZmGSr0KHwJz52NKVcLdUgf8XQj7F5Z9rXi3/mDe ZcqyqdoWK7WROes+9o/TIG1xpfQZZYYG5nyNJE56QTtktrnfxhdQ09k1M1Le6xwsStDc hp9gCkwdCaCdnPV3u6kpQpe0tDDwBdb7gyMUV2WbA+o/rilpicaiiml2XP8OjgXhKmNb FVWw==

> drive under your nose and say "What's the password?" and can send
> you away for another five years. (IANAL etc, but I am under the
> impression that it's not a situation where you can't be repeatedly
> charged with the same offence). Good game, eh?

Thank god, this is factually incorrect. Even our country isn't that
screwed up (yet).

Happy to stand corrected!

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq

References:
- Re: [LUG] Hardware Encrypted SD
  - From: Rob Beard
- Re: [LUG] Hardware Encrypted SD
  - From: Daniel Robinson
- Re: [LUG] Hardware Encrypted SD
  - From: Simon Avery
- Re: [LUG] Hardware Encrypted SD
  - From: Simon Avery
- Re: [LUG] Hardware Encrypted SD
  - From: bad apple

Prev by Date: Re: [LUG] Hardware Encrypted SD
Next by Date: Re: [LUG] Hardware Encrypted SD
Previous by thread: Re: [LUG] Hardware Encrypted SD
Next by thread: Re: [LUG] Hardware Encrypted SD
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread