[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/06/13 22:20, Gordon Henderson wrote: > > Most of the third party tools do it the same way. At least that's > what I found when searching about it. Apple broke lots and lots of > captive portals overnight and everyone was scrabbling round to > "fix" them just to please the iDevice junkies. I'm not aware of any published standard for "captive portals". Or any IPV4 "host authentication" mechanism, However "transparent proxying" is rather difficult without breaking RFC791 sometimes additionally performing a "Man in the Middle" attack. Is Apple really to blame if they make changes which result in what is basically a "hack" failing? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlG475MACgkQsoRLMhsZpFcYbQCdGBDPr1W7e5FXSikhqFU6ZK1G iFkAn2oYwLoEncT4UMICH9XM+pZzwywI =4DMe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq