D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] .bad apple.

 

On 28 March 2013 10:29, Martijn Grooten <sweetwatergeek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Simon Avery wrote:
>> There might be something buried in the headers to show it went through
>> a server belonging to a freemail provider, but I wouldn't like to
>> guarantee or monitor it to ensure no ham got hung up.
>
> Unless I misinterpret what you're saying, it's relatively easy to
> determine whether an email was sent from one of the (big) freemail
> providers. The reverse DNS of the connecting IP is usually the biggest
> give-away; most of these providers will also add a DKIM signature to
> the emails.

Actually, you're right. On thinking some more about it, I've
remembered I'm currently scoring freemail providers via some standard
rules in Spamassassin which are reasonably robust.

> But I doubt that helps a lot here. I did some back-of-the-envelope
> calculations and found that around 1% of email from legitimate Yahoo
> accounts (i.e. accounts not set up by spammers) was spam as a
> consequence of the account being compromised. Other webmail providers
> (I checked Hotmail and Gmail) performed better than that (especially
> Gmail). YMMV of course, but even if 10% of email from Yahoo were spam,
> blocking them would see you throw a lot of babies with the bathwater.

I don't track rejected spam other than numbers. I stopped caring so
much about it some years ago since it's checked and bounced at smtp. I
think we've talked this talk before in here fairly recently, but I do
agree - and what is very clear with spam is that there is no one-fix
solution, and whenever something like that does happen, it doesn't
stay true for long.

As arms races go, spam is up there as one of the fastest changing -
which is why for personal mail I'm quite happy to use gmail who take
care of it for me.

> As to why Yahoo still hasn't solved it, we can only guess. They
> probably have bigger problems to deal with.

They've always been a bit different to everyone else, and made some
odd decisions over the years. I'm fairly glad I've never hitched any
of my wagons to them.

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq