Re: [LUG] MS refund was:Re: 20thC FLOSS accountancy

[Brad Rogers <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:23:35 +0000
Simon Waters <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello Simon,

> I suspect what Brad meant to say is the contract is "not binding" since
> you can't enter someone into a contract without at least giving them
> the opportunity to examine and assent to it.

Yes, exactly that.  Incorrect terminology on my part.

Ultimately though, if ebuyer sell the machine with Windows and a
purchaser declines to accept the license, ebuyer would probably expect
them to return the machine for a refund, rather than just get a refund
on Windows.  Assuming Windows is already installed (almost inevitable),
of course.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
The stakes were high but the danger low
Charade - Skids

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq