[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 26/06/11 09:04, Tom Brough wrote: > > I think the point is that I believe the "no blank boxes" came after the "no non-Microsoft OS" contracts, and the "must still pay us for non-Microsoft OS" contracts were ruled anti-competitive. Although the history of Microsoft and anti-competition law is long and tortuous, making digging up a reference tough. http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f0000/0046.htm -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq