[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] photo ownership
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] photo ownership
- From: Adrian Midgley <amidgley@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:32:32 +0100
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zo2Ml0/pF8eTJ61MTJe4e7xtY5Rz6QxOB2i/FvNDxFA=; b=qvp+sHvrvpXxZGrYPyqdJrsT4R+rtbmtgYHCbMQ512dzboy/rySObChlSJsqm/jiXS d91DQJXn0tHO3qUdOtLfpH1j56G+a7IIfDfKdmz/NB/qvDE9crttX62jv2XyVUx2ydh1 aHFLrkHMfPRSLI05KNdncBWcL8pzJBF5d4nbo=
It isn't ownership though.
The question is copyright.
For most of us Cory Doctorow and Mick Jagger have the right argument.
The problem isn't that people want to "steal" our work, the problem is
that people who'd like to see/use/share/buy it do not knwo we exist.
This is different for Sir Mick.
--
Adrian Midgley http://www.defoam.net/
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
