[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Royalty free standards for UK procurement

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] Royalty free standards for UK procurement
From: Adrian Midgley <amidgley@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 00:35:03 +0000
Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cugQZcuhD2JbakzxV8ECGPm4e7ilPCY/1QWQrec6ydA=; b=oZYQmfy04SzOoqPFRD0WqeKTmHNbcqF2YtOxT3dZ3va7UhMWLCKI9rIfPo4z4vJ6ym ltAJ5WCFu9Cg36z9x0CG5vHnKomAKTh5TGfKyQg/9f0s8EYQRzcH+oNdYbCDVW80kzNN KBWnlz0PhTXQXUClqTNqrfQ+yjn9k83z5Wbjo=

On 28 February 2011 00:12, Rhia Knowles <rhiadratech@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 27 February 2011 23:05, Adrian Midgley <amidgley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Which state, please?
not so much the states as the senators, I gather.

Above
> "
Best solution I have seen implemented* is if department wants to use
proprietary software total initial and recurring licence costs must come
from salary pot of top ten executives in department. i.e a negative
bonus! It sorts out the real costs and why!

*non UK state where budget constraints were enforced.

"

Which state, please?

--
Adrian Midgley http://www.defoam.net/

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq

Follow-up: Re: [LUG] Royalty free standards for UK procurement
- From: Eion MacDonald

Prev by Date: Re: [LUG] Mac or Windows
Next by Date: Re: [LUG] Comical phone call. MS vs Linux & Malware.
Previous by thread: Re: [LUG] Comical phone call. MS vs Linux & Malware.
Next by thread: Re: [LUG] Royalty free standards for UK procurement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread