[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Ahem. Atoms aren't 64-bit!
Sorry about the top posts, Android hates lists!
On 17 Sep 2010 19:59, "Rob Beard" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 17/09/10 18:30, Neil Winchurst wrote:
>
> On 17/09/10 12:07, Julian Hall wrote:> OK. But any new computer I buy nowadays will almost certainly be 64 bit,
You'd be hard pushed to find a PC with a brand new up to date CPU that wasn't 64-Bit capable. ÂI know AMD CPUs have been 64-Bit now for ages (the early Socket 754 Semprons were 32-Bit only) and Intel have been 64-Bit too for a long while on most of the range (not sure about the early Atoms, maybe someone could comment?).
> right? Or is that not s...
I'd be surprised now if you went into a shop and bought a system that wasn't 64-Bit capable (even the single core 2.2Ghz Celeron M 900 Âis 64-Bit capable now.
What you're more likely to find is CPUs that don't support virtualisation extensions (which speeds up things like VMWare and Virtual Box) such as AMD-V or Intel-VT. ÂMost AMD chips support AMD-V but there's a fair few Intel chips out there which don't support Intel-VT.
Rob
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: h...
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq