[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 22/08/2010 07:32, tom wrote:
Is that because it was originally developed by Macromedia not Adobe and they now realise they have a knowledge gap in what needs to be done?On 21/08/10 21:20, tom brough wrote:I think the trouble is more that Adobe are simply not capable of writing the code.On 21/08/10 12:55, Rob Beard wrote:On 20/08/10 22:35, tom brough wrote:Surely flash is irrelevant with the conception of HTML5?Not entirely, it would require millions of web sites to make HTML5 versions available, and since a whole load of people still use IE6 it's not going to happen overnight. RobI think the point(s) I am making are: 1. Why would adobe continue to support a product that's going to be obsolete sooner or later. Its not going to be in their interests to develop and support 64bit versions if HTML5 overtakes, or shrinks their market considerably. Long time till that happens agreed, but it will.
Julian -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq