[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Neil Winchurst wrote:
But Neil - surely you believe that commercial interests are much more capable of supplying the customers needs that a government owned one? There must be some logical reason why my work on a 2.4Gb fibre optic 'repeater' that would have cost <$5 was shelved twenty years ago.Dan Dart wrote:What hope have for BT succeeding in the IT market.Too much, they're the monopoly. But they still suck and have crap support.I have said this before, but here goes. I shall never understand the 'thinking'? behind having the telephone system for a Western European country run by a private company with shareholders. Crazy. BT are the main reason, IMHO, that we are so far behind many other European countries with our broadband speeds. Neil
It cant have been for the shareholders so it must have benefited someone.... Tom te tom te tom -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html