[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Henry Bremridge wrote:
My suspicion is that public bodies do not want to switch to FLOSS for one of the following reasons: - Our contracts specify proprietary software. - The current system works (aka the devil we know is better that the devil we don't) - When we have looked at it, we have looked with a view to seeing how it will not work. We have not tried to think how we can make it work. - We do not know our current software will run on it. - We have data sharing agreements that run on proprietary models
Call me cynical, but I'd add to that something along the lines that the *huge* companies that currently tender and are awarded the contracts to produce the current set of bespoke "national" software have large groups within them who actively lobby the govt., etc. to tell them that their way is best...
If you or I go in to tender for something, then we'd get laughed away in the breeze.
What's needed is a large enough company with enough clout and lobbying power to go in and write it using FLOSS tools for them....
... but they'll never make it open source, GPL or whatever because they're too embarased to show what a shocking cock-up they'll make of it...
Gordon -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html