[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
"The maximum theoretical speed of 802.11n is 300 Mbps." What are people finding in the real world (in this case a rural/suburban home situation with 4 other users in sight)? "It also has a greater effective distance." Again what sort of difference does this make? I.E. is it really worth the effort of upgrading the laptops - the bridge I really should replace given that it has partly malfunctioned anyway... I suppose... On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 23:54 +0100, Julian Hall wrote: > M.Blackmore wrote: > > I've been hesitant to replace a malfunctioning* wireless bridge and plus > > buy an extra repeater for the other side of t'stone wall, 'cos I was > > under the impression that "n" was still in draft, but I've noticed a lot > > of "n" stuff appearing. I thought the ratification was happening this > > month, October - has it actually happened earlier > http://www.itpro.co.uk/615082/ieee-finally-certifies-next-gen-802-11n-wireless-standard?CMP=NLC-Newsletters&uid=fd05eec0062e1c24af07921b38ed8498 > > *basically yes* > > and I was asleep? > > > Unknown ;) > > Kind regards, > > Julian > -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html