[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 17:39 +0100, Tom Potts wrote: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/09/uk_gvt_browser_guidelines/ > > make this viral please It's not as bad as it looks - ACID is only useful for HTML/CSS combinations and derivatives. It doesn't test support for images and Flash etc. So ACID compatibility would not meet the needs of the original purpose of the document. Mac and Linux support is explicitly *included*, as is Firefox/iceweasel. Opera loses out but then Opera is non-free. Some mention of ideas around anybrowser.org would be a very good idea but not much more would probably could have been expected. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html