D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Beowulfed LTSP?

 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Grant Sewell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Whilst watching a foundation degree student's presentation on their
> project - building a Linux beowulf cluster - the idea struck me... what
> a wonderful way to generate enough processing power for an LTSP server.
> 
> I know there are some people on the list who have a bit of LTSP
> experience, so I was just wondering if (in their experience) a beowulf
> cluster would actually work well as an LTSP server?  If it were to
> work, it could even benefit from being configured as a COWs (Cluster of
> Workstation) - so the LTSP server cluster would also be able to pull
> processing power from the idle workstations connecting to it!
> 
> It's late and I'm getting excited about this now... dammit, I'll never
> sleep!
> 
> Cheers all.
> Grant.
> 

Beowulf clusters are about clustering machines that can "kick butt"
processing wise.  LTSP is more about centralizing resources (reducing
admin time) and allowing lower spec machines to be kept in service
longer as clients.

Someone designing a computationally intensive cluster of computers would
normally want to use the fastest processors available, and standardise
on machine build.

While in theory your idea is sound. I think you would want to consider
the cost in terms of power consumption / processing power. You could end
up with a very powerful (but very expensive to run) cluster.

Also consider that there is a scaling factor, you would need to add more
lower spec machines to the cluster to get the same power, and each
machine needs to be synchronised with the rest of the array, the law of
diminishing returns kicks in quicker the lower the spec of the machines are.

You can't get more out than you put in, so if everybody on the cluster
wanted to run kick butt processes, the performance would degrade quickly.

On the other hand it would be fun to try it, as long as I don't have to
pay the energy bill ;-)

Tom.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkhh4HgACgkQBX2gJWUv0ivcxACfeCCqEw7AaCi0YYcS+tL05twG
pCUAoIgirAXDMzh5UluDXNH4Kl5FnVe4
=NJDz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html