[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Sunday 20 January 2008 00:03, Julian Hall wrote: > Neil Williams wrote: > > Ads on TV are the only real way of affecting the masses - why else > > would the fees be so high? > > Radio? I think a large proportion of people also listen to the radio at > least on a daily basis. I know I do in the car. BBC notwithstanding > commercial radio stations also need advertisers to stay afloat, and > they're cheaper than TV. Hell half the time I can tell it's one of the > DJs reading the advert, so it's not like they spent the earth on casting :) > > BTW I spend about 4.5 hours a week in the car, and *maybe* slightly more > watching TV. In my case, and maybe others, advertising budgets would go > further with radio. > Good point there Julian. Classical FM is a good one, vibrating wallpaper for millions daily: erhaps while they are at home - staring at "Blue Screens" Hoardings, and especially adverts on the tube. Must have read "millions" in my time. -- W. Devon ----------- A GNU/Linux user -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html