D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] ooxml and explanations

 

On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:20:12 +0100
Paul Sutton <zleap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Jonathan Roberts wrote:
> > I would also make it clear the proprietary formats don't garuntee that
> > you'll always be able to read documents produced in it: if Microsoft
> > decided to end support for .doc 
> 
> that would really screw anyone up whos spend hours putting together a 
> time capsule to be dug up in 100  years time,  as people then won't have 
> the ability to read the files,  where as with open formats,  the spec 
> can be included in plain asc text,  so computers in 100 years can 
> perhaps still read these open format files.

100 years could be ambitious Paul - are we *really* sure that the forms
of digital media that we have now will survive that long and even if
they do, that we would have the equivalent of a gramophone today to be
able to read them?

File formats are one thing - hardware lifespans are quite another.

-- 


Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

Attachment: pgpjrUGXojFE0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html