[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Sunday 02 September 2007 02:23, Mark Jose wrote: > On Sunday 02 September 2007 01:32, Ben Goodger wrote: > > On 31/08/07, Brad Rogers <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:58:16 +0100 > > > Julian Hall <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Julian, > > > > > > > True I just prefer Imperial :) > > > > > > Same here. I still call it all real, rather than old, money. > > > > > > How many people under 30 can tell us what LSD (as in currency, NOT > > > recreational drug) is short for, I wonder? > > > > Libra, (sisterna?)/shillings, denarii if I guess correctly. I know it's > > the useless £sd system which was got rid of 1971, though. I'm glad to > > have a sensible currency system nowadays. > > I'm nearly 17. a)12 is divisible by 2,3,4,6 b)10 by 2 and 5 c)20 is hands and feet LSD is not rocket science but far more useful for simple calculations - until inflation made it a bit too fine toothed . It was actually a bit more intuitive and because of a) there were a lot of handy tricks for division and multiplication. The Roman number system didn't stop it creating the largest empire known. An easy number system doesn't make for less error prone calculations - as far as I can tell it leads to the opposite. Memory techniques essentially rely on making you more aware of what you are trying to remember, the apparent inconsistencies in LSD seem to have had a similar effect in making you slightly less complacent, and hence more aware, of what you were trying to do and so actually less likely to cock up. And this message is not in the least self consistent at any level! Tom te tom te tom -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html