[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 17:45:54 +0100
james kilty <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 14:55 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > OpenOffice.org 2.0.4a,
> Thanks Neil. Please would you explain why it does not have OOo 2.1?
2.1 is not in Debian at all, unstable has 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7 and
experimental has 2.2.0-1. Stable and testing have 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1 .
Personally, 2.0.4 is fine. When 2.1 makes it into unstable, I'll look
at the issue then.
Debian stable is NOT about the latest and greatest, it is about STABLE
packages.
Is OOo stable in Ubuntu ? If not, what does one do about it ? Are earlier versions more stable ?
Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html