D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor

 

Kai Hendry wrote:
> On 2006-07-12T01:23+0100 John Daragon wrote:
>> As for Web-based office automation ? OK for amateurs. How anyone who a)
>> values their data and b)is interested in user experience can think that
>> running complex code on shared remote processors is sensible when they
>> could run it on an unshared local one is, frankly, beyond me.
> 
> With Web based tools I think a user is more aware of their "data". It's
> not just something that sits in their 'My Documents' for some trojan to
> trash. It's also probably going to be much safer on a 'Gdisk'.

I'm not worried about data integrity. My (and my customers') documents
are about as secure in that regard as its possible for data to be. What
I *am* worried about is data security. Our documents on someone else's
disks ? I refer you to the amateur statement above.

> 
> User experience? Can you argue Outlook has a better user experience than
> Gmail?

Absolutely.

> Complex code and Office applications go hand in hand. In fact I would
> argue Windows source base is probably the most complex code around. Look
> at their docx spec and compare that to ODF.  Trust your data to that
> model do you?

Oh, yes.  As it happens.

jd

-- 
John Daragon                                       argv[0] limited
Lambs Lawn Cottage,   Staple Fitzpaine,   Taunton,   TA3 5SL,   UK
v +44 (0) 1460 234068  f +44 (0) 1460 234069 m +44 (0) 7836 576127

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html