Re: [LUG] Some discrepancies in the (G)LUG...

[Rob Beard <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoting Grant Sewell <dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Hi all.
>
> I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but there seems to be some
> considerable variance in the time it takes for messages to appear on the
> (G)LUG.
>
> For example, I wrote a reply just now (Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:29:35) in the
> Farseer enterprises thread.  It appeared on the (G)LUG within 1 minute
> (that's the update interval I have set for my mail notifier).  However, I
> wrote a reply to my own thread - Testing Surround Sound - a good few hours
> ago (09:56:19) and as of now (14:35:xx) it hasn't actually arrived on the
> list yet.
>
> This is not a necessarily a problem, I just thought it a little unusual.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Grant.
> -- 
> Artificial intelligence is no match for nuratal stidutipy.

I've noticed that some replies have come thorough before the original message, 
for instance, the Farseer Enterprises Continued message came through after 2 
or 3 replies.

I just put it down to my mail server playing up and not downloading mail in 
any logical order (it downloads form about 5 POP/IMAP accounts).

Rob




--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.