Re: [LUG] clustering

[David Johnson <dj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve Marvell wrote:
> Clustering for load balance, parallelism or redundancy?

Load balancing. It's mainly just to experiment and put the machines to 
some use running Seti@xxxx or something.

> The more kit you have, the more likely you are to have a fault.

5 machines, with the fastest being a dual 55MHz :-)


I've been looking for a clustering project which supports Linux on sparc 
- does such a thing exist? I sure can't find one.
I guess I'll have to look into Beowulf...


Thanks,
David.


--
A child of five could understand this! Fetch me a child of five.


--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.