[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
On Monday 14 October 2002 14:02, you wrote:
Looks promising, but to do this in a general way is pretty tough I suspect. This one is probably okay for collecting a series of comments from people you "trust" on a document.
Yes. I'm looking at a way for certain authorities to comment robustly on some alleged health websites, to protect consumers.
What is this 'ere Allegra (everything and it's dog (at least those that can speak latin) is called Allegra)?
The topic as ahndled by Jakob Nielsen is "Reputation Management"
Allegra provided a set of traffic lights for your browser, and a set of
voting buttons to match.
It also held a central database which for me would remark upon my being
middle class, white, degree, living in SW England and maybe a few more bits
and pieces and interests.
It then mangled the votes that users asked according to their profile, and
preented lights to users according to that mangling.
"People like you thought this site {sucked|was OK|rather good actually}"
IIRC as you hovered over a link...
--
From one of the Linux desktops of Dr Adrian Midgley
http://www.defoam.net/
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.