[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 23/07/13 12:32, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:57:44 +0100 > Paul Sutton <zleap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello Paul, > >> 1. is to filter out search terms that can be used by people to find >> child porn, this can be countered as people have pointed out there are >> other ways in which people find content online not even using web >> browser and search engine as such. Offenders will simply find way to >> circumvent all this. > > It's a waste of time anyway; Purveyors of child porn go to some length > to ensure their stuff doesn't show up in the usual search engines > (yahoo, bing, google, etc.) for what, I hope, are obvious reasons. Exactly, as i said they find ways to circumvent what ever measures are put in place. As I said I agree we need to be targeting abusers and making sure they are not only caught but punished so it sends a message out, however I don't think our MP's have the guts for that. Paul > > > > -- -- http://www.zleap.net http://www.linkedin.com/pub/paul-sutton/36/595/911 I am committed to safeguarding children, young people and vulnerable groups and expect any school or establishment I am involved with to share this commitment. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq