D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] The rationale behind dynamic IP addresses (was: Your ISP - and IPv6)

 

On 05/07/13 21:53, Martijn Grooten wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:36 PM, bad apple wrote:
>> This is so true... I've always thought it crazy that ISPs want to charge
>> extra for a static IP. It's actually less work for them after all.
> I've been wondering this for some time as well. Could it be that
> changing the IP address every once in a while 'solves' a lot of
> problems, from an IP address being blacklisted because your son had
> spent an evening trolling the Internet, to your computer being
> attacked because you confused a firewall with a welcome mat.
>
> Martijn.
>


The answer really has to be that historically, a static address was
really the preserve of serious, expensive leased line type connections:
everyone else was just hitting dial-up for a few minutes every couple of
hours to sync their mail and check a site or two. Of course, when you're
dealing with thousands of concurrent dial-up modems, you're going to
stick them all in a DHCP pool and call it a day. But now, unless you
live somewhere pretty rural (and I know some people on this list, being
Devon/Cornwall residents have some truly awful internet connections even
now, through no fault of their own) you're going to be permanently
connected 24/7 with high speed DSL/cable/fibre. You would think that the
modern scenario would incentivise  the ISPs to simplify things by
converting all these broadband systems to static and saving costs on
staff and systems but...

In the old world ISPs could charge you extra for that static IP, if you
really needed one for your home business or something. Simply speaking,
I wouldn't go quite as far as to call them greedy, but yes, I contend
that DHCP is the norm these days purely so they can still chase down
extra revenue from those who want a static setup. Even though thinking
about it, that surely can't be a lot of money? A very small percentage
of customers ever apply for a static and it's usually only a couple of
quid a month anyway.

I've never worked for a ISP, so I can't share any insider knowledge I'm
afraid. Who knows? Maybe there is actually a really solid logical reason
and we just haven't spotted it yet.

Regards

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq