[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] computer stuuuuuuuuufffff
- To: "list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [LUG] computer stuuuuuuuuufffff
- From: mr meowski <mr.meowski@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 19:44:04 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yB6MDqIVOyg4CKBrarmE4ocMr15yHzQmq5EiHSVDQDg=; b=eGL+kc5D4ndJjmCK1z6wrPuBbgwNFH5CZIw2l8Fku3ORQbej+oQ73QwfgIyLNxwYhFvrSjUWNVsp5OCzMm022q3DPlHd/RLr5snM9ZyAaEZjWY8f3ICf2ejxBwRgici7OZuTP+u80fnQg5lGQVZSDColES9pNbkd0S7db5p840+fh+MSiXjuZrQx5WZ3EowR7ivyNcIjoBctQycwpkXe5o89YZelH9Qc6yMf7TEot69XZAXO2r9kLaqfFs3/SU44xvWIoUKatxhXWUwtIUkLPRT2rTtNE/OXQrMl4tQbsAXhDcdA4NNVs+u0/2n189hEm2vZqJ+8ofiUiXalojU7mw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jrCMQWJBr9GamhP5jkVWXej2zYVfrT0o/+FDNB/jtb8bO1b5uc6XeCCdRoXWeEenRGxJnG+f3wWXdkvG15ck8pZlgz0HR02MMRSa5a5YCNSLTo9DHKh7PGPn2tVOikhEQvKCCiUn0x9eOBd4yci+AIWDir0DCXN8+04vzO2Gw4tbrF7Ct6hLOdSlERu9/YILa/2ei93Hz3fr5Ez77GENqfAMh+0oir/mNb9566MI3V+0erVpRZPxKfC8LTRYs/hEwOIEKLeTzI15ggvg9aKydX+ZlKr4y82nMqZrrvKxEd53JGJ/wy3v28AasPTGbO1JH6nzZKWNUZrUQ3gBOAbDZA==
- Content-id: <A3210FB8A3015740A503DDEA18F05594@eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
- Content-language: en-US
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dclug.org.uk; s=1570611962; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type :Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject :MIME-Version:Content-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Date:To:From:Cc: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ydKmkYuumOfdEkHVvya+Ui0BhPGZy7PsZ1AgePQ/S0k=; b=DnqewRd/0RaDnl9P/D38JfF8yq m0Fm9OGdnaUZW110mb57WBz/jtXrYgebgVnGwcGiqW1chuDv7AU0Fd6sBdFCLmtVh9zhcrwRYeaQU pmVF7OadErDHhcofwTjhDqPkREDtPpwhIrcWjjxeCL+xzsKSw6FGX0Ik1NYw66op10P8=;
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=live.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yB6MDqIVOyg4CKBrarmE4ocMr15yHzQmq5EiHSVDQDg=; b=knjGQU+TNoYvbABvTq09HT/IVr80yTS/DjVJCRtBYd1mlDQXv2paApN/zeoaZ3peDrkTtN0fW1uzE/uIETFhQRNX/buAqLJx3Ditf+8Nz2DP0mqEEwaoZx41Hl9Un8Hfoqgjxqb/a3iiR/140BYfqeGlNDMkU90++J8QF89ZWHQPcUtFK78V31ZThVMNe5x0f/rXPYa9VozCWuD58R0v7nTnzXsdTBNTyfyC1+OdVCbQfxnS4vKq8T6Mzy53Klgh5u1Z4LG3LDxi4KeVXHbPCcgC0Lxtjbc5dOD3trOe/fDNJ7vi7W3Uyk3WdUer0JGPxi6JlYP/PFfPh1qu22PJWA==
- Thread-index: AQHVlZxQB2k+S6chKk6PcLge4G/59qeAEcWAgAAKawA=
- Thread-topic: [LUG] computer stuuuuuuuuufffff
On 07/11/2019 19:06, Giles Coochey wrote:
>
> I am growing to accept your approach on these things, and would start to
> consider it just tolerating your personalty.
Haha, I feel like I just got a massively backhanded compliment there but
hey, I'll take it!
You seem quite sold on the processes side of things and for all I know
are completely correct - it certainly sounds reasonable enough but I
think I'm beginning to get to the point where I can safely be regarded
as a bit old fashioned in that sense. I came up in an IT environment
where all management waffle about such things would be roundly mocked
and dismissed as word salad before we'd get back to the actual work of
fixing things in the trenches.
That of course probably says more about me and how things used to be
back then - I work with some more modern and focussed companies these
days who genuinely seem to have adapted and actually follow organised
management policies such as you mention, instead of just pretending to.
Sounds like you're probably lucky enough to work for one of them.
> I get where you are coming from on this, whenever I introduce a product
> like this, I like to ensure that I mention:
>
> (1) It is not my product.
> (2) When it comes to implementing a product that some form of trust
> needs to be implied between the user and the provdier of that product.
>
>
> I had to interject in the talk so many times "if you trust", that I
> almost think it became a mantra for the talk, and I think it would be a
> mantra I would repeat in any similar conversation, because that it the
> crux of the whole privacy thing, if you choose to outsource, or move
> your traffic elsewhere, you are only moving the point of "trust"
Well I like the cut of your jib then - I love it when people make huge
sweeping generalizations about everything and forget that it by
necessity includes them as well. Security vendors are great for this:
"You can't trust anyone!". Well, great, that includes you then geniuses.
"But you can trust us!" Hmm...
Especially in these days of the GDPR and data protection I repeatedly
warn clients to not just take my word on it - of all people, double
check your so-called security expert even if it's me. _Especially_ if
it's me, I don't want to get in trouble later because someone blindly
accepted the first stupid thing out of my mouth one morning.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
https://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq