[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] OT : USB Robotic arm wanted
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] OT : USB Robotic arm wanted
- From: Simon Waters <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 13:09:29 +0000
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dclug.org.uk; s=1538993161; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type :Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject :MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:To:From:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=A8kaalvEwB0U7+zElLl4fFiGoQ9jvxBbg6CX5Qvsh6o=; b=flLAAEpDhXMEGI4jgzY1zLrTJZ 8FQrJHHy8RZUStN5mW+sNgMcciuFyovWMStfPZ3AjR+i2RQfNNjUaQl4wL9SdpL2uj0SeS2E61on3 z90UDAJ3oXpDGbl7IS8UVAQ2eA/x4XnqdPqu28G7pJSrv8FPXm0c5VEbDFD9uWzwF3do=;
On Thursday, 13 December 2018 19:02:11 GMT Splodger wrote:
>
> Pretty sure it's common practice in environments where security is
> paramount.
The idea that unapproved USB device ID would work on a network where security
is paramount...
Let alone that they wouldn't discipline folk for deliberately subverting a
security control.
If the controls are that bad, and there isn't clear cause, go ask
security.....
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
https://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
