[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Some good reading for those with an open mind. Some big names here.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.04738v1.pdf
Prof Hawking has been thinking for a while about some of those things, but has not yet arrived at this particular candidate TOE.
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016, 16:01ÂJoseph Bennie <jay@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:very good light entertainment .
[my personally hypotheses of life the universe and everything ]Its interesting in that spacetime (gravity) is not a thing, It is a construct to make relativity calculable, its a co-ordinate system and we plot observable events in it, and progressive change. The progressive change results in resistance due to interactions at the levels of quantum mechanics driving the effects on the harmonies inside quarks and the like. Lets call them strings.. *
I find Its better to understand that there are individual bubbles of stable super-symetical activity around a central point, that point also being know as a higgs boson. The bubble is a quark. There are many-many variations of a quark Âand theres some interesting Ted talks about super-symetry and string theory, which are now backed up by experimental evidence, and the fact that the Higgs was discovered at exactly the energy point that supports both the theories.
Overall when we observe the resistance of these bubbles interacting as events we call it gravity (think tangible sphere in motion on a path or orbit at a macro level). And the interactions yield energy transferences as both observable electromagnetic field energy (at the micro level: super-symetric decay that does not break down but influences a pathway out with the impenetrable part of bubble shell ) and (super-symetry decay that does break down [escapes some penetrable orbit limit]) as electromagnetic emissions. In fact its predictable that the emissions of these harmonies within the bubble will in turn causes fluctuations in the super-symitry at a quantum level and therefore strings break there obit and transfer into paths that leap from bubble to bubble, I expect these will be photons. (bursts of energy packets at specific frequencies) and overall support the notion that strings are harmonies that orbit a virtual point and can and do interact with their neighbouring bubbles at both close (direct electrical influence) and near&far distances (indirect orbits influencing other orbits but not colliding) Â
It wouldn't 'surperise me in the slightest that the strings of energy have infinity frequency variations but only some are at stable frequencies, and like all frequencies, have constructive and destructive amplification, but remain unique, thus never join and constantly move with the only influencing factor being a Higgs, the Higgs is a number at which the harmonies become so densely interwoven that any new energy immediately ejects some other energy, and there can only be specific variations of this and there will be some relationship with prime numbers and Fibonacci sequences. (implies not all Higgs are the same, but from an external perspective are very nearly the same)
I think in time the interactive effects (force) at a planetary level will be determined to be directly influenced by the rules that govern the inner of quarks. (not the other way around)
small bubbles of stable cyclical transforms and interactions that are described by super symmetry and in the end the Higgs will be the pivot point of these symmetries. and as we know these bubbles are quarks, and quarks compose atoms, atoms compose planets, etc etc. Â
[Blackholes and positive progression]* If you are loosing positive progression, its expected you are near or on the horizon of a black hole and if its (theoretically) negative progression your energy is exiting a black hole once all evidence of your prior complex harmony has been reduced to the singular phase of the blackhole.(another way to think about this is the radius of the black hole expands, and everything you were has transformed into the same properties as the hole itself)Â
In the black hold your progression is zero = (no phase differential = no individual potential because all is converted into the singular angular momentum at a single uniformly stable harmony, more importantly this is expressed as any area in a black hole have no difference, no matter what the mass of the object. therefore no relativity has a spatial component, but not a time component, its the same all the time and never changes) Â
[Energy of the Higgs]Somewhere there must be a significance in the E=mc2 and the specific energy of the Higgs.Â
[The beginning of time]Is simply the point at which some black hole, stops being a black hole.
I mean when a singularity stop eating, they will eventually lose density (they eject energy) at which point all the potential will no longer be in a state of stability and the hole will be colossally mammoth, instant inflation would make sense, as the black hole would effectively disintegrate nearly instantly from the centre out Â(nothing would need to travel to reach a great distance from the origin as it would all ready be relatively a long way from the central origin, and be carrying the angular momentum it had while in the black hole. Thus appears to have traveled a long away at incredible speed uniformly.Â
Its possible this isn't very common because the vast size of the hole and the time it takes to decay afterwards is boggling, think bigger than our known observable universe. (limited only by the rate of the holes decay , the rate of its expansion and the rate of the new things to eat being available)--
On 13 Feb 2016, at 09:10, Daniel Robinson <manipula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ohh, they did say something..Âhttps://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2016/02/12/wave-bye-bye/--
On 13 February 2016 at 08:56, Daniel Robinson <manipula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thankfully no.. and sorry to force my opinion (Mix of bad personality trait and a subject that I really love).
I follow the electric universe concept, I'm a bit of a raving fan. -Â
Perhaps I could have responded to the original topic better, perhaps by saying..Good news for physicist - but I won't be getting excited about it. - I'll let Steve Crothers, Don Scott and Wal Thornhill do all the talking.
On 12 February 2016 at 19:09, Adrian Midgley <amidgley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You don't do this for a living do you?
One of the oddities about gravity is that it is attractive, unlike the electrical force.
The energies at which they all are one, hypothetically, are above that required to send the observed ripple through space.
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, 15:36ÂJohn Horne <john.horne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 17:40 +0000, Daniel Robinson wrote:
> I don't do einstein.. he was wrong about almost everything.
>
Wow! That's a bold statement.
John.
--
John Horne         ÂTel: +44 (0)1752 587287
Plymouth University, UK
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq