On 02/04/14 11:32, Paul Sutton wrote:
On 01/04/14 22:39, Simon Avery
wrote:
Not getting into this in any depth, but:
I agree we need a breakdown and more information but surely this
is about protecting children and young people from finding
material that clearly worries them,
Perhaps the issue is more about innocent searches, girls of
10/11 may do searches for "breasts"for reasons that should be
obvious, however it is what they then find, so again how do
we better educate people about going through the search results
rather than simply clicking on the first item that comes up.
Again we need more information.
Paul
Some years ago a friend of mine in America was a teaching
assistant in a kindergarten. They were doing a science project
and one girl wanted to do hers on the human tongue. To cut a long
story short when she did a web search my friend shot across the
room, and shortly after content filtering software was installed -
as it should have been /already/ in my opinion.
Julian
just checked the blog, which is not devoted mainly to porn - mostly
misuse of stats and media hysteria, and the writer has updated her
writing on the origins and reliability of many of the things we are
hearing in the media and from the pundits.
http://www.ministryoftruth.me.uk/
It's an entertaining blog, whatever she writes about. Worth checking
out.
S
--
www.oldhouse-cottage.co.uk
|