D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Fwd: Microsoft scam man is sentenced

 


On 02/04/14 11:38, Tom wrote:
On 02/04/14 11:08, Paul Sutton wrote:

On 01/04/14 19:04, Martijn Grooten wrote:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 06:33:23PM +0100, Julian Hall wrote:
However, a greater penalty would - OK should - make people think
twice before driving in a manner which is more likely to cause a
death, than legally, e.g. speeding in a built-up area or
drunk-driving.  At the moment the worst case scenario for most
offences is a hefty fine and a driving ban, if however the worst
case scenario was a hefty jail sentence people /would/ think twice.
I don't think so.

We're not talking about the difference between a hefty fine and a
driving ban and a hefty jail sentence, which is obviously big. We're
talking about the difference between a hefty fine, a driving ban AND
killing someone and a hefty jail sentence AND killing someone.

The reason people don't think twice is not because the punishment isn't
severe enough. It's because people don't think they are going to kill
someone.

At the end of the day they've caused a death, and company directors
have been charged with manslaughter negligence for deaths they had
no personal involvement in at all.  I'm just saying drivers deserve
the same penalty.
Perhaps it would help if those drivers making the same mistake
(speeding, drunk-driving) but who through circumstances didn't kill or
injure anyone were given the same sentence as those who do. That's more
likely to make people think twice.

But actually, I'm not for tougher sentencing at all. I'm a liberal sissy who happens to think that way too many people are sent to prison for too
long a time and it tends not to help in most cases.

(Apologies for continuing this obviously off-topic thread.)

Martijn.
The rules on talking about such subjects and parents who are over sensitive and won't listen to the explanation that they were asked sb


I am guessing it is a bit like knife crime, according to the law carrying a knife gets you 5 years in Jail and yet, people have gone to jail for just over that for stabbing someone, so clearly lets say for sake of argument that person gets 7 years, that works out at 5 years for carrying a knife and 2 years for stabbing someone.

Before you respond imagine it was a close family member who was the victim,

One of the parents at the rugby club said that the prospect of the cane didn't necessarily deter her at school, what did was the prospect of her father with the belt when he found out about something she was involved with. The argument here is NOT about corporal punishment, but i think its like has been mentioned before deterring people in the first place.

I am not suggesting we flog people for bad driving but perhaps if someone decided to beat your face to a pulp for your phone then maybe a good hiding with a birch would be somewhat proportionate, after all if you think you are big and tough to beat some one up you are man enough to take the punishment as my teacher said at school if you can't do the time, don't do the crime.

ASBOs seem to be considered as a badge of honour, would a few lashes of the birch be seen a badge of honour or actually deter people from re-offending. Maybe rather than jail if you are caught speeding then you simply gets points off your license, and no come back on your employer if you are sacked, however that doesn't really help you or the taxpayer as you end up unemployed, so cost taxpayers more money.

This conversation is a little like the child protection one, there is NO right answer, but i think the word education comes in to both debates.

Either way I think what we need to do is BE CONSISTENT with punishment, so drink, drive, mount the kerb and mow someone down, WILL get you a set period in jail. and the same period regardless of which judge you are in front of.

Violence has little effect on some people. The lads who got the slipper at school got it regularly - it only deterred people who wouldn't do anything anyway. My Dad beat me for something I didn't do once and my behaviour deteriorated considerably as a result which leads me to believe that our corrupt and incompetent police force would happily make things a lot worse. I think the best solution is to take control of cars out of peoples hands - the car industry wont like it without regular damage to repair - and I love getting lost and finding new places - but its technically quite easy once the political barriers are out of the way.
Tom te tom te tom

Long term this will happen as driver less cars (or maybe pods) become the norm, until then we need to address the issue of bad driving,

the comment on bad parking is a good one, local school has signs up saying do not park on yellow lines, yellow zig zag lines and some people do the opposite, ironically making the whole road more dangerous for their children.

In schools we try and encourage positive behaviour, for example if you are running down the corridor and someone says "don't run" the child hears the word "run" if you say thank you for walking then it has the effect of promoting the behaviour you want, and people will walk,

I agree, with you finding new places, something that does not always happen, sat navs are great until there are road works or in the case of the pen inn roundabout you see the road through kingskerswell is full of traffic so head for the milber turn off, (those who are local to torbay / newton abbot will know where I mean) the sat nav would probably go crazy,

Local road knowledge is important, as you can get from A - B quickly by heading down an alternative route. Something that a automated driver probably can't do, I found driving directions once that was between 2 places in Denmark (I think) but the directions seem to go via newcastle, (In the UK) driving across the north sea.

Another example was near china, and you drive across the pacific ocean to taiwan. so these maps are only as good as the humans creating them, and like real printed maps are still prone to errors.

How would these auto driving cars cope with the recent floods, this is where manual override is useful if not essential.

Paul

--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq