[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful
From: Philip Hudson <phil.hudson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:55:28 +0000
Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=2TwQjMhs9/mMAHdNO4EUlaOsd+fwcBzPA/KVR6tPAMI=; b=UBT+59Aw+QH+mAdHSRlWWv+bZTOLszsI7S+Qq8GvWx+xShAnY6ftgtAv77gGoTGPfP 84Ov2KvwMJ/g3DIq20cAKuIePzep5AvsiN6VYzpFeNCiWvkif4JjHkrNffmkFJfD1hTn +hOrblRtKxFdsB1oFS+kvrXwbHnYk4wYMpioBsj3lyia010QPvcYWW2tRkY7owuWR/pY X4viZCu+N4rZ4wwORh8O9Anl4eB5WzOt304BfDy8rPH5m066EpPee0TJAhkPXav3etdP L+mLeHETE/+cuzJbHN2JA+wlEoGDadGlDCnl+mBpOAlrezDrq+qUaEjuIua80EuylbAb Kohw==

On 20 January 2014 23:40, Simon Waters <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

reasons that
are never explained.

Source vs binary distribution. FTFY

I'm sure there's a name for that...

--
Phil Hudson http://hudson-it.no-ip.biz
@UWascalWabbit PGP/GnuPG ID: 0x887DCA63

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq

References:
- [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful
  - From: Philip Hudson
- Re: [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful
  - From: Gordon Henderson
- Re: [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful
  - From: Simon Waters