[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
From: Tom <madtom1999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 19:56:29 +0000
Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=akGpmchTNQ75HZL8n+Yx4Atjljnu7Fe5zXNDfwVpSck=; b=0Z8uRLB2qaex9oZEa5+AQXQIDTiKXTbzyqau7WN/Edar63Kjjx9NC9RZyeauPcD9nC Pfw4//NM25QNZizpiJcMZXXJgS6uVZbC/LCR1eW3r+1sdJLcrT00S/gvOWhCRlOxbEVX pN42C4+smApBci93oHTrBpvNKMmQzng5mSEkMXv5yp44S84jsUftWHAmuHyiyGwTf0ZN 9ndx2NcSEO3XyEzoYqmyfjLc2GtzCKHX/mIaHMKEF70nxcm5PRdQKts+ocbn0kSmPa6D NSaTyCRIKBQ0Q9jKEiQv3dF7GqvGy2OsrxILFZbi0YK/Ta3BnRSWzrv+8kEFhXLyAeUk H0Zw==

On 09/01/14 19:54, Simon Avery wrote:

On 8 January 2014 13:19, Tom <madtom1999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Are there any distributions out there that keep up with developments without dropping 386 support?
Even if I have to build my own kernels I've a few old machines I'd rather not bin.

Do we need to stage a LUG intervention?

Let them go, Tom. I'm sure they've served you well, so let them rest...

Perhaps I should have said 32bit machines. I do have a 50Mhz 486 but everything else is still good to go!
Tom te tom te tom

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq

Follow-up: Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
- From: Simon Avery
Follow-up: Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
- From: bad apple

References:
- [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
  - From: Tom
- Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
  - From: Simon Avery

Prev by Date: Re: [LUG] CentOS joining the RedHat mothership
Next by Date: Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
Previous by thread: Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
Next by thread: Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread