D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Samba 4 was Small quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 computer runs Windows

 

On 13/12/12 20:14, Rob Beard wrote:
>
> I saw that the other day, I'm interested in having a play with it for
> some of the AD specific features on Windows (and not having the
> expense of a Windows Server).  It's one of those things though that
> I'll look at eventually, for now at home at least Samba 3 is doing the
> job nicely. :-)
>
> Rob
>
>

It's worth pointing out that none of the common distros (if any at all,
I haven't checked all my hosts yet) have yet rolled the 4.0 proper
package out via there repos - they are still distributing the RC or beta
versions so it's worth holding off until the 'real' 4.0 hits your
distribution channel. Unless you feel like compiling it yourself that
is, which I don't recommend for the faint hearted. If you really want to
do it properly, there are some decidedly non-trivial OS reconfigurations
to be made as well, such as modifying your fstab to fully support
options required by SMB and even kernel recompilations to tune/enable
certain settings. These changes are a must for enterprise stuff, just
like rolling an Oracle DB server or other big iron correctly, but if you
just want to play at home you definitely don't need to worry about of
these more hardcore settings.

It's probably also worth pointing out that Samba3 is likely to be enough
for almost anyone playing at home - it already has full domain
capability including limited AD functionality with group policy support,
etc, but can be compared in overall maturity with NT/Server 2000 tech:
for example, still primarily only supports ye olde PDC/BDC distinction,
only supports SMB1 without hacks and so on. Samba4 is a major leap
forward in functionality and with a few more in-development features
finalized will be an almost complete drop-in equivalent for 2008RC2/2012
servers which for cross-platform specialists will be a life saver. I
can't even begin to guess just how much of my working life I've spent
trying to convince various Unix, Linux and Windows systems to play nice
together on the same networks.

Lastly, Microsoft are surprisingly generous with their test-for-free
downloads - you can usually get 90 day fully functional trials of nearly
everything, including stuff like Sharepoint services, Exchange, etc to
experiment with for free. If you've got a decent enough machine and are
comfortable with virtualization tech you can pretty easily set up your
own virtual testing lab for fun, education and even profit. Being a
linux guru is all well and good but in the real world every skilled
linux tech I've ever dealt with also understands windows boxes as well,
and you're not going to get a very good job as a linux expert if you
can't even make your linux systems integrate with the Microsoft tech
that is so prevalent.

https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/business/products/downloads-and-free-trials.aspx

Regards

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq